orphicmusic.com Blog

June 25, 2007

Plural

Filed under: Uncategorized — Derek Smootz @ 9:02 am

When you’re in a show, you hang out with the cast of that show a lot, particuarly while the show is running (rehearsals are often a “getting to know you” phase, so there’s less socializing, except when a number of you have worked together before).  A number of us from Ruddigore went to Magnolia Cafe after the show last weekend, and I submitted the following query to the group:

If “booth” had a plural, what would it be?  

Now, I know that “booth” does, technically, have a plural already: “booths”.  I don’t like it.  It just seems to me, given the way the word rolls off the tongue, that “booth” deserves a more intersting plural.

The group discussed the possibilities, and while no formal vote was taken, I’d say there were two clear favorites: “Beeth”, modeled after “goose” and “geese”, and “Bithe”, modeled after “mouse” and “mice.”  I think I prefer “beeth”, because it’s the easier of the two to pronounce correctly based on its spelling.  I’d love to hear other opinions on this important subject.

June 6, 2007

So very tired

Filed under: Uncategorized — Derek Smootz @ 2:29 pm

Opening week for any show is crazy, and this is opening week for Ruddigore.  I’m tired.  Between work and rehearsal, I would be short on sleep if I went to bed right when I got home, but I get home with a hyper brain, so I’m getting far too little sleep.  Being tired – at least when you’re in relatively good spirits about your life (as I am with the fun of the show) – is a little like being drunk.  Everything seems emotionally charged and bittersweet, from working to listening to music to rehearsing.  It’s a beautiful feeling, if an unsustainable one, and I find that I’ve missed it for the past few years.  Yay, tired!

May 17, 2007

You know you have too many CDs when…

Filed under: Uncategorized — Derek Smootz @ 10:02 am

…you go out of your way to find out what a song is and who it’s by, only discover that you already own it.
A year or two ago, I called a local radio station to find out what song they had just been playing. I had also heard this song at the club recently and thought it was really cool. It turns out it was “Come Undone” by Duran Duran. Not only do I own a Duran Duran greatest hits CD with that song on it, I had it in the car with me at the time.

Also, there’s a song in a couple of X-Files episodes that I’ve made a mental note to look up in the past. Apparently, I lost the note, but as I was listening to Moby’s Play album yesterday, I discovered that the song in question is Moby’s “My Weakness.” I honestly thought it was part of the X-Files score and written by their in-house composer, but it turns out I owned a copy of the song before I owned the X-Files on DVD.

March 7, 2007

How Ghastly

Filed under: Music — Derek Smootz @ 10:04 am

I would say I’m an established member of the Gilbert and Sullivan Society of Austin’s troupe. Technically, they don’t have a troupe, but I’ve performed in nine or ten of the group’s productions over the past eight years. This summer, I’ll be singing in the chorus of Ruddigore. I get to be a ghost! Actually, the whole thing is kind of disappointing – I tried like I never have to land a principal role in this show. I spent an inordinate amount of time working on my audition song, and read the through the whole script at least five times to prepare for the reading part of the audition. It’s a hard thing to do your personal best and fail. But, there it is. I probably need to start auditioning for other shows (non-G&S shows) and get some more general experience in order to improve my odds of landing roles. If you’re local, come see Ruddigore – The G&SSA site ought to have performance information up soon.

February 5, 2007

Ants don’t belong in microwaves.

Filed under: General — Derek Smootz @ 8:32 am

Living in Texas, I should be used to bugs. My parents house has always had a minor scorpion problem. My college apartment was a seasonal breeding ground to what looked like small wasps, but thankfully turned out to merely be large flies. Ants have found the kitchen everywhere I’ve lived. But, for some reason, I panicked the first time I came home to find ants all over the kitchen counter of my current house.

Whatever the psychological underpinnings of my reaction (it may have been the first “Bad Thing” that happened in/to my house), it was…energetic. I squished ‘em, I drowned them, then I squished ‘em some more. Yet, there were still so many. So, I grabbed a paper towel, and started squishing with that. I suppose I thought it would have more surface area, so I could squish more at the same time. I failed to realize that paper towels are far too soft to kill ants, and soon they were running around the paper towel. A few started to find their way onto my hand and arm. So, I threw the paper towel in the microwave and started it. It seemed like a fitting vengeance. Then the paper towel caught fire. I slammed the button to open the microwave door, after which I intended to dash to the sink to get water, but the draft of the door opening wafted the burning towel out of the microwave, and onto my counter. The next few seconds, as I stared at the fire on my kitchen counter, in a house I’d be paying off for 30 years, were long indeed. The first thought I had after “aaaaaagggghhhhhhhhh!!!!” was that you put a fire out by depriving it of air. So, that’s what I did. With my hands.

For quite a while afterwards, I thought to myself, “How stupid were you to put a paper towel in the microwave! It’s paper, and paper burns very, very well when it gets hot!” Since then, it has occurred to me that I’ve been putting paper towels in the microwave my whole life, albiet ususally to cover what I’m trying to heat up. I still don’t know if a lone paper towel in the microwave would catch fire, or if the ants were the key ingredient. In any case, I now keep bug spray under the kitchen sink. It’s much more effective than the microwave.

January 29, 2007

Pan’s Labyrinth

Filed under: Movies — Derek Smootz @ 4:22 pm

I may be the only person alive who does not feel that this is a great film. I went to Rotten Tomatoes hoping to find a reviewer who could clearly articulate my dissapointment, and I find not one negative review. So, it’s up to me to voice my own objections.

First, I should amend my initial statement; “bad” or “good” are too ambiguous of terms to sum up my feelings about this film. When the credits began to role, I felt that a bad movie was ending, but a few days later, I can only say that the movie made me feel angry and sad. Generally, this is not what I want when I go looking for entertainment. But, the movie definitely made me feel something – it certainly wasn’t boring or trite.

In part, my expectations were set incorrectly – I was expecting to watch a fantasy movie. The main plot is indeed full of fantasy, well-concieved, well-written, and beautifully executed. However, while the setting of most fantasy films is merely a backdrop, the setting of Pan’s Labyrinth (the aftermath of the Spanish Civil War, and the efforts of the victors to quell remaining rebels) gets a lot of screentime, and is thoroughly entwined with the main plot. The result feels to me like two movies have been mashed together. While this seems an interesting concept, it doesn’t work for me. To exacerbate things further, I dislike the rebels, who are the intended protagonists of this subplot. While they don’t commit the atrocities of the fascists, these rebels make a concious, onscreen choice to continue a hopeless fight, propogating the cycle of killing and suffering, rather than “crossing the border” and leaving a lost war behind.

There are characters in this story who I deeply like (the doctor). There’s some great eye candy, though it sometimes seems a consolation for sitting through sequences set in the mundane world. There are single shots that speak volumes (pile of shoes). There are examples of superb and subtle storytelling (pocket watch). There are some pretty feeble storytelling moments, too (grapes). In the end, though, there’s not much escapism, and that’s what I was looking for.

January 11, 2007

Based on a true story (SPOILER for horror fans)

Filed under: General — Derek Smootz @ 2:37 pm

You may have heard or seen some adds for a new horror film called “Primeval,” touting the film as being based on the true story of a serial killer, still at large, who has claimed over 300 victims. What the ads don’t reveal (understandably, given the nature of what they’re advertising) is that the killer is a crocodile named “Gustave.” He lives in war-torn Burundi, and is often referred to as “legendary,” leading me to wonder if many crocodile attacks in the area may be misattributed to him. Anyway, this is actually a serious post – I ran accross this quote on the National Geographic site:

Faye and other witnesses saw Gustave last November on the Bujumbura shore area, which is very good news, as many feared he had died or been shot. Apparently, two more deadly attacks were linked to Gustave’s coming back. Since then, we’ve lost track of him. It is difficult to spot Gustave these days due to the heavy showers that have poured over Burundi over the last two weeks. Water in the lake is high and muddy. The rainy season has been intense this year; the water levels will finally go down in April.

I understand that a very large, old, and aggressive animal is interesting from a certain perspective – I was curious enough to look this up. However, I don’t see how anyone can write in good conscience that his continued survival is “very good news”, followed immediately by “two more deadly attacks were linked to [his] coming back.” Faction leaders of Burundi may have little regard for human life, that doesn’t mean that the lives of the Burundi people are acutally trivial.

January 3, 2007

Me vs. TV

Filed under: General — Derek Smootz @ 10:10 am

I’ve been known to complain about television.  I made my own “Break Your TV” shirt, inspired after seeing a tee that said “Exhalt your new God” with stylized hands praying to an idiot box.  To clarify my own throughts, and to have somewhere to point when people ask what I’ve got against the greatest American passtime, I’m going to explain myself.

Complaint 1: Commercials irritate me, both at a visceral and an intellectual level. Viscerally, I simply don’t like constant, pandering interruptions in my entertainment. I have better things to do with my time. Intellectually, I view advertising as a “tragedy of the commons” problem. Like lawyers, advertising is an overhead cost of our society. It performs a necessary role – informing the public that products are available – but every dollar spent after achieving that goal is meaningless. Given their interests, we cannot trust advertisers to provide a fair and balanced appraisal of their product. Overall, the capitalist system of competition is very efficient, but this is one of its ugly points.

Complaint 2: I think it’s unhealthy and wasteful to schedule your life around trivial entertainment. It’s been a very long time since I’ve been addicted to a show, but I know many people who go out of their way to be in front of a television at certain times.

Thanks to TiVo, there’s a way to solve these first two problems. I wonder what long-term effect it will have on broadcasters whose primary revenue comes from advertising, but for now it makes watching television a less onerous task. It doesn’t wholly placate me, though.

Complaint 3: The producers of televised material have a conflict of interests with the viewers. When we go to the movies, we want to be entertained. The creators of movies share our goal – they want to entertain us so we’ll recommend the movie to our friends, see other movies by the same creators, and maybe even buy merchandise related to the movie. Likewise, when we watch TV, we want to be entertained. But, the goal of television producers is subtly and critically different – they want us to keep watching. As long as we sit through the commercial breaks and come back next week, they’ve done their job. They can, and sometimes do keep us coming back by providing good entertainment. But, they also use frustrating cliffhangers and stretch story archs far beyond their limits. We get watered down creative work because a season requires a certain number of episodes, whether there’s a story worth telling or not. We get second- and third-string writers, who may not care one whit about the characters, because the creators and main writers are overworked, or have simply decided to move on. Shows don’t end when their story has been told – they end when the ratings fall, resulting in truncated masterpieces and zombies of shows that don’t know when to die.

So, I’m not much of a television fan.  If you hear me talking about how I love a particular show, I almost certainly watch it on DVD.

December 12, 2006

Grammy Nominees

Filed under: Music — Derek Smootz @ 5:18 pm

I happened into the list of this years Grammy nominees. Frankly, I’m woefully unqualified to comment on any of these (I haven’t heard all the nominees for a single one of the 80+ categories), but I’m going to anyway.

Best New Artist: Imogen Heap was a member of Frou Frou, who released an album in 2003. Yeah, she’s “gone solo,” but her being on this list seems kind of silly to me.

Best Male Pop Vocal Performance: Daniel Powter’s “Bad Day” and James Blunt’s “You’re Beautiful” both hurt my soul a little – partly due to being overplayed. Usually, I feel the same way about John Mayer (though it has nothing to do with being overplayed – his vocal style just makes me cringe), but I really like the way he’s singing “Waiting on the World to Change.” I want him to win this, hopefully encouraging him to make this change in vocal style permenant.

Best Pop Performance by Duo/Group With Vocal: I really love some Death Cab songs, but they don’t seem to be the one’s that are popular. I’d vote for “Brothers on a Hotel Bed” any day of the week.

Best Dance Recording: I love Depeche Mode, but I don’t see how “Suffer Well” is a “Dance Recording.” Compared to a Timberlake song, though, SOLD!

Best Rock Performance by Duo/Group: I absoluetely love Coldplay’s “Talk.” I don’t yet have any of their album’s (Christmas should change that), but I really think Coldplay puts out some good tunes.

Best Banda album: What’s Banda?

Best Polka album: Really? I didn’t know there was still a big enough fanbase…

Best Soundtrack for a Motion Picture, etc.: I’ve actually seen four out of five nominees, and the only one that I clearly remember being moved by is that of Narnia.

Best Instrumental Arrangement: The first two songs on this list are “Attack of the Killer Tomatoes” and “Three Ghouls.” This is a great category.

Best Album notes: I can’t believe this is a category. If it was established back in 1997, I hope Loreena McKennitt has won – she has crazy-fun liner notes.

Producer of the Year, Non-Classical: I like that someone goes by “Danger Mouse,” and I’m impressed with the wide appeal of “Crazy.”

Best Choral Performance: Austin’s Conspirare choir was created by Craig Hella Johnson. I went to choir camp led by this guy!

December 6, 2006

Accessible – another rant about a single word’s meaning.

Filed under: Music — Derek Smootz @ 11:22 am

Well, I don’t suppose this is really going to be a “rant,” per se. Rather, I was thinking about a couple of reviews I’m going to be writing soon, and started wondering how well-defined and well-known the meaning of “Accessible” is in the context of music. It came up a lot in my college music classes, particular when discussing 20th Century Classical music, and I find that I tend to place almost everything that I listen to along a sort of Accessibility Scale in my mind. So, I’m going to attempt to explain my interpretation of the “Accessibility” concept here. I was able to find one formal definition, in a music dictionary called Dolmetsch Online:

Accessible – approachable (personality), easy to understand (idea, concept), requiring little intellectual effort (music, work of art).

This is a great concise definition, and the last phrase perfectly reflects the elitist tone with which many “serious” musicians and reviewers use the term. I strongly disagree that music must be difficult to enjoy in order to have value, but there do seem to be people who hold such an opinion.

While the definiton of “Accessible” is straightforward enough, I think that its specific meaning differs from person to person, because musical taste is partially developed, rather than wholly inherent. While some people are more flexible than others, we can generally get used to different styles of music. In a broad sense, we’re all used to Western tonal music. Most of us are also used to verse-chorus song structure. Since Top 40 radio is based on these concepts, it’s generally pretty accessible to everyone. This demonstrates an important distinction – the fact that something is accessible to you doesn’t necessarily mean you’ll like it. I’m certainly not a fan of most Top 40, but I can recognize the verses and choruses, and I can quickly decide whether I like the vocal style, the arrangment, the bass line, etc. I have a solid frame of reference, and I think that goes hand in hand with defining how “Accessible” something is.

I have a theory that people like to listen to music that is fairly, but not completely, accessible to them. We like to push our limits, but not too hard. Since preteens and teenagers haven’t been around long enough to get bored with standard radio fare, they listen to Top 40 and other super-mainstream music. Indie rock, which could be described as more varied and challening than Top 40, finds a warm reception in most college towns and radio, where people have had their fill of the straight-ahead stuff. Classical music is frequently associated with the older generation, which is appropriate given the complexity that has developed in this umbreally genre over the past 500 years or so. The excessive familiarity that comes from constantly working with music helps to explain the elitist sneers of my self-proclaimed nemeses, the “serious” musicians and reviewers. Of course, there are many other factors that contribute to musical taste (nostalgia is another big one), but accessibility seems to be an important piece of the puzzle.

Older Posts »

Powered by WordPress