orphicmusic.com Blog

February 5, 2007

Ants don’t belong in microwaves.

Filed under: General — Derek Smootz @ 8:32 am

Living in Texas, I should be used to bugs. My parents house has always had a minor scorpion problem. My college apartment was a seasonal breeding ground to what looked like small wasps, but thankfully turned out to merely be large flies. Ants have found the kitchen everywhere I’ve lived. But, for some reason, I panicked the first time I came home to find ants all over the kitchen counter of my current house.

Whatever the psychological underpinnings of my reaction (it may have been the first “Bad Thing” that happened in/to my house), it was…energetic. I squished ‘em, I drowned them, then I squished ‘em some more. Yet, there were still so many. So, I grabbed a paper towel, and started squishing with that. I suppose I thought it would have more surface area, so I could squish more at the same time. I failed to realize that paper towels are far too soft to kill ants, and soon they were running around the paper towel. A few started to find their way onto my hand and arm. So, I threw the paper towel in the microwave and started it. It seemed like a fitting vengeance. Then the paper towel caught fire. I slammed the button to open the microwave door, after which I intended to dash to the sink to get water, but the draft of the door opening wafted the burning towel out of the microwave, and onto my counter. The next few seconds, as I stared at the fire on my kitchen counter, in a house I’d be paying off for 30 years, were long indeed. The first thought I had after “aaaaaagggghhhhhhhhh!!!!” was that you put a fire out by depriving it of air. So, that’s what I did. With my hands.

For quite a while afterwards, I thought to myself, “How stupid were you to put a paper towel in the microwave! It’s paper, and paper burns very, very well when it gets hot!” Since then, it has occurred to me that I’ve been putting paper towels in the microwave my whole life, albiet ususally to cover what I’m trying to heat up. I still don’t know if a lone paper towel in the microwave would catch fire, or if the ants were the key ingredient. In any case, I now keep bug spray under the kitchen sink. It’s much more effective than the microwave.

January 11, 2007

Based on a true story (SPOILER for horror fans)

Filed under: General — Derek Smootz @ 2:37 pm

You may have heard or seen some adds for a new horror film called “Primeval,” touting the film as being based on the true story of a serial killer, still at large, who has claimed over 300 victims. What the ads don’t reveal (understandably, given the nature of what they’re advertising) is that the killer is a crocodile named “Gustave.” He lives in war-torn Burundi, and is often referred to as “legendary,” leading me to wonder if many crocodile attacks in the area may be misattributed to him. Anyway, this is actually a serious post – I ran accross this quote on the National Geographic site:

Faye and other witnesses saw Gustave last November on the Bujumbura shore area, which is very good news, as many feared he had died or been shot. Apparently, two more deadly attacks were linked to Gustave’s coming back. Since then, we’ve lost track of him. It is difficult to spot Gustave these days due to the heavy showers that have poured over Burundi over the last two weeks. Water in the lake is high and muddy. The rainy season has been intense this year; the water levels will finally go down in April.

I understand that a very large, old, and aggressive animal is interesting from a certain perspective – I was curious enough to look this up. However, I don’t see how anyone can write in good conscience that his continued survival is “very good news”, followed immediately by “two more deadly attacks were linked to [his] coming back.” Faction leaders of Burundi may have little regard for human life, that doesn’t mean that the lives of the Burundi people are acutally trivial.

January 3, 2007

Me vs. TV

Filed under: General — Derek Smootz @ 10:10 am

I’ve been known to complain about television.  I made my own “Break Your TV” shirt, inspired after seeing a tee that said “Exhalt your new God” with stylized hands praying to an idiot box.  To clarify my own throughts, and to have somewhere to point when people ask what I’ve got against the greatest American passtime, I’m going to explain myself.

Complaint 1: Commercials irritate me, both at a visceral and an intellectual level. Viscerally, I simply don’t like constant, pandering interruptions in my entertainment. I have better things to do with my time. Intellectually, I view advertising as a “tragedy of the commons” problem. Like lawyers, advertising is an overhead cost of our society. It performs a necessary role – informing the public that products are available – but every dollar spent after achieving that goal is meaningless. Given their interests, we cannot trust advertisers to provide a fair and balanced appraisal of their product. Overall, the capitalist system of competition is very efficient, but this is one of its ugly points.

Complaint 2: I think it’s unhealthy and wasteful to schedule your life around trivial entertainment. It’s been a very long time since I’ve been addicted to a show, but I know many people who go out of their way to be in front of a television at certain times.

Thanks to TiVo, there’s a way to solve these first two problems. I wonder what long-term effect it will have on broadcasters whose primary revenue comes from advertising, but for now it makes watching television a less onerous task. It doesn’t wholly placate me, though.

Complaint 3: The producers of televised material have a conflict of interests with the viewers. When we go to the movies, we want to be entertained. The creators of movies share our goal – they want to entertain us so we’ll recommend the movie to our friends, see other movies by the same creators, and maybe even buy merchandise related to the movie. Likewise, when we watch TV, we want to be entertained. But, the goal of television producers is subtly and critically different – they want us to keep watching. As long as we sit through the commercial breaks and come back next week, they’ve done their job. They can, and sometimes do keep us coming back by providing good entertainment. But, they also use frustrating cliffhangers and stretch story archs far beyond their limits. We get watered down creative work because a season requires a certain number of episodes, whether there’s a story worth telling or not. We get second- and third-string writers, who may not care one whit about the characters, because the creators and main writers are overworked, or have simply decided to move on. Shows don’t end when their story has been told – they end when the ratings fall, resulting in truncated masterpieces and zombies of shows that don’t know when to die.

So, I’m not much of a television fan.  If you hear me talking about how I love a particular show, I almost certainly watch it on DVD.

October 26, 2006

That’s MY name, YOU can’t have it!

Filed under: General — Derek Smootz @ 10:08 am

Intellectual Property law is the bane of musicians – we want to focus on our art, but if we don’t file the right papers or put the right symbols in our liner notes, we can find that someone else has stolen our work, or worse, claim that we’ve stolen theirs. But the music itself isn’t the only thing the law entangles – artist’s names can cause problems as well.

Fans of Conjure One may notice that the same voice sings Center of the Sun and Make a Wish from the first album (credited as Poe), and Endless Dream, One Word and Extraordinary Ways from the second (credited as Jane). Why the change in pseudonyms? The rumor is that her former label, Atlantic, is tenaciously holding onto the rights to the name “Poe.” Try as I might, I’ve been unable to find a clear, official source to document this, but I found plenty of hints and allusions on Poe’s website.

A more humorous example is found on the back of Aphex Twin’s “drukqs” album. The back cover includes the following disclaimer, verbatim:

Aphex is a registered trademark of Aphex Systems Limited and is used by permission.
(This must be in same font, text size etc as rest of artwork, and clearly legible.)

October 25, 2006

O Frabjous Day!

Filed under: General — Derek Smootz @ 12:38 pm

I should have heeded my own warning – I ended up frittering away half an hour at Ishtar’s site (see today’s earlier entry). When I pulled myself away, I was left with a burning desire for new music. I’ve never seriously listened to Aphex Twin, but I’ve heard a bit here and there and thought it was interesting. So, I read through his Wikipedia entry and headed off to spend lunch at the record store.

I love the Barnes & Noble near my work – they have tons of those listening stations where you can scan any album to hear samples and (usually) read a critic’s review. Being a frequent customer, I thought I was familiar with their stocking system. They have a Classical wall and small bins for New Age, Christian, World, and Rap, with pretty much everything else – including Aphex Twin – stuck into Pop/Rock. I looked through the “Ap”s, but couldn’t find Aphex Twin.

“Apoptygma Berzerk is here (yoink!), and they’re not nearly as big as Aphex Twin,” I thought. “Well, the Wikipedia entry had mentioned the pseduonym ‘AFX,’ so maybe ‘Af’ – no, not there either. Surely they didn’t think ‘Aphex Twin’ was a person’s name, and file it under ‘Twin, Aphex’ right? No, not there…”

So, nearly defeated, I headed over to the small, out-of-the-way “Dance” bin that typically holds compilations with swimsuit models on the cover and names like “Super Ultra Trance Party 2004, Volume XVII, Mixed by DJ 1337-f4ce.” But, to my surprise, this was no longer the “Electronic/Dance” bin – it was now the “Rap” bin! So, what now occupied the space where Rap had previously resided? I looked over that way, and the first thing to catch my eye was the new Engima album. And above it, the new Delerium album! And there, in the corner, was Aphex Twin. And there was Olive, and Armin Van Buuren, and Orbital…all in the new *Electronic* bin!!! The swimsuit girls are right there beside the real stuff, and the sign still says “Pop/Rock,” but this is my new home. Well, at least when I’m shopping for music at lunch.

October 16, 2006

About Art

Filed under: General — Derek Smootz @ 10:07 am

You probably wouldn’t expect a musician to cite a game designer as an influence. However, the most concise discussions of the foundations of art and aesthetics that I have read are to be found in articles by screenwriter-turned-game-designer Mark Rosewater. If anyone knows of good books or websites on these topics, let me know.

From Rules of the Game:

“Art,” one of my favorite teachers would always say, “is the act of expressing as much as possible with as little as possible.”

“Art Is Not Supposed To Have Rules.” I’m not quite sure where this myth comes from. My guess is that people see art as a right-brain activity and rule creation as a left-brain activity. But the two are fundamentally intermixed. Art, music, poetry, dance, photography, writing – each one is filled to the brim with rules. Whether it’s called technique or theory or simply “the proper way,” each form of art comes with its own discipline.

From Zen and the Art of Cycle Maintenance:

Humans have an innate desire for balance. Their aesthetic senses respond favorably to having things even out.

Beauty isn’t subjective. The first thing we learned in the class is that beauty is very objective. There are certain qualities hardwired into the human brain that make some traits more attractive than others. That isn’t to say that there isn’t some variance from person to person, because there obviously is, but aesthetics can be studied as a science.

EDIT: If you’re skeptical about these statements, consider Experimental music – its purpose is to throw away all rules and structure.  In my experience, it’s not very popular.

September 13, 2006

A new era of talking to myself…

Filed under: General — Derek Smootz @ 3:33 pm

Since I’ve been so slow to update the News section of the main site, I thought I’d try using blogging software instead. Perhaps this can begin to bridge the gap I have placed between myself and Longing for Orpheus. In case you’re unaware of just how bizzarre that statement actually is, I should mention that (so far, at least) I am the sole member of Longing for Orpheus.

Previously, I’ve gone out of the way to present the project as independent from myself. There are two related reasons:

  • I want Longing for Orpheus to have its own identity – I view it as an independent piece of art, and I don’t want my own political views or love of goth-industrial dance music (disparate examples, I know) to taint its meaning.
  • The other side of the coin is that I don’t want anyone to associate me so closely with the New Age genre that they won’t give my Synthpop stuff a chance.

So, this isn’t the “Longing for Orpheus” blog – its the “Orphic Music” blog. Here, I’ll speak with my voice, about whatever interests me, and probably mostly to myself (please, prove me wrong).

If you really insist on shattering the illusion, go ahead and meet the everyday me.

Powered by WordPress