orphicmusic.com Blog

December 1, 2006

Relative Alternative

Filed under: Music — Derek Smootz @ 10:25 am

I think we now have enough distance between ourselves and the 1990’s to “look back” at the concept of “Alternative” music.  According to the Wikipedia, the term came into existence in the mid-1980’s to describe the first generation of post-punk genres.  By the time I became aware of the “Alternative” label, it basically applied to all non-rap popular music.  For a brief time, the uniquitous “Pop/Rock” signs in record stores were replaced “Alternative” signs.  I’m amused now, as I was then, that everything was alternative.  What was it an alternative to?  I don’t remember anyone having a very good answer for that.  Over time, the term fell out of of use, and we’re all back to calling anything mainstream “Pop/Rock.”  It may be an overgeneralization, but at least its not a paradox.

A couple of years ago, I heard of the “Duetche Alternative Charts.”  I love these things for a number of reasons.  First, they have nothing to do with “Alternative” as we Americans used to know it.  Furthermore, and again in contrast to our legacy, the bands on these charts are of a distinctly different style than mainstream music.  Finally, a lot of bands on these charts are Synthpop and/or Industrial.  In 2005, Green Day and Coldplay did make it onto the Top 100 singles chart (there are a few other well-known names, but these are the only representatives of “Mainstream” music by American standards).  But, they were beat out VNV Nation, Apoptygma Berzerk, Iris, and many others.  Depeche Mode’s “Precious” was number one.

It seems likely to me that the whole music chart system (admittedly invented as a marketing tool) homegenizes what people listen to.  If an album or single gets to the top of the charts, people listen to it more, and more people listen to it.  The charts ostensibly only reflect trends, but given the existence of Top 40 stations and radio countdowns, they clearly influence what continues to be played as well.  If Billboard, which currently summarizes the trends of the entire U.S. in its charts, were to divide the nation into many regions, I wonder if different and varied trends might emerge.  For now, I’ll have to be content with what Europe has to offer.

November 21, 2006

The best sentence in the whole wide world.

Filed under: Uncategorized — Derek Smootz @ 7:07 pm

So, while I was waiting to finish downloading tracks to do a remix over on Acid Planet, I decided to read through the contests full rules, legalese and all. That’s when I found this. Even if it’s not the best sentence in the world, the bold part has to be the best phrase:

You hereby grant, sell, transfer, assign and convey to the applicable Publisher, its successors and assigns, all present and future right, title and interest of every kind and nature whatsoever, including, without limitation, all copyrights, all music and music publishing rights, and all rights incidental, subsidiary, ancillary or allied thereto (including, without limitation, all derivative rights) in and to the Contest Submissions for exploitation throughout the universe, in perpetuity, by means of any and all media and devices whether now known or hereafter devised.

November 13, 2006

Applied Minimalism, Part II

Filed under: Music — Derek Smootz @ 11:53 am

I decided to have a shot at writing something Minimalist myself. Now, I don’t feel that I could ever listen primarily to Minimalist music, or that many people could do so and be happy. I have, at times, thought it was incredibly boring. That said, I decided to commit myself to it and disregard my own criticical feelings for an evening.

Like most musical movements, genres and styles, Minimalism cannot be defined in black and white terms. The understanding of the concept from which I worked is this: The Western music tradition is an epic of cluttering up good, simple music ideas with a lot of extraneous ornamentation. So, I attempted to write a piece of music that embodies what I’ve been working on as Longing for Orpheus, stripped bare of ornamentation. There are no counter-melodies. There aren’t really any melodies. The whole point of “Orpheus, Briefly” is to move from a static a7 to an interplay between that chord and an Fmaj7.

To reflect the World Music influence of Longing for Orpheus, I included a quiet 1-bar hand drum pattern in the background, with accents every 4th bar. It never changes.

Longing for Orpheus makes heavy use of reverb, so there is reverb on the synthesizer line of “Orphic, Briefly.” What I did not anticipate is that the changes in the level of reverb that I programmed in over the course of the song are the most interesting part of the song. Until the very end, the changes are subtle, and you never would have heard them in a more complex soundscape. I think this kind of thing is what the creators of Minimalism found so intriguing about extreme simplicity, and I can understand why.

November 9, 2006

Wampage!!!

Filed under: Computerlove — Derek Smootz @ 2:02 pm

It’s true – Internet Exploder is a lame browser. It can’t handle padding values in % form – I think it treats them as percentages of its maximum potential width, rather than of the parent element. As long as I had them in my style-sheet, IE was opening my page at a ridiculously large width.

I also discovered that Explorer cares about whitespace where it shouldn’t. This:

<tr><td><a target=”_self” xhref=”http://www.orphicmusic.com/AE/supported.php”> < img xsrc=”http://www.orphicmusic.com/AE/T/AEmenu4.gif” alt=”Supported Artists” border=”0″ /></a></td></tr>

should do the EXACT SAME THING as this:

<tr><td>

<a target=”_self” xhref=”http://www.orphicmusic.com/AE/supported.php”>

< img src=”http://www.orphicmusic.com/AE/T/AEmenu4.gif” alt=”Supported Artists” border=”0″ />

</a>

</td></tr>

But no, the second one would be too easy to read! So, Explorer puts about 3 vertical pixels of space at the bottom of the image, forcing you to use the hard-to-follow first version if you want your page to look good.

Explorer also has bad breath.

On the other hand, I’m so very happy that the world has Gimp. It takes some time to figure out how things work, but it’s !FREE! and you can do a whole lot with it.

This is all fallout from the latest revamp of my Nu Ambient review site.

Oh, in case you’re wondering, Wampage = Rampage + Webpage .

November 6, 2006

Universal Themes

Filed under: Music — Derek Smootz @ 12:01 pm

I have sung in high school choirs and musicals. I have sung in college choirs, small and large. I have sung in the chorus of a number of community operettas. Now, I’m singing in a community choir.

I have never sung in a choir where everyone arrived on time. I have never sung in a choir that sat quietly and attentively after the director’s cut-off.

Directors must be meant to suffer.

November 3, 2006

Applied Minimalism

Filed under: Music — Derek Smootz @ 10:17 am

One of the more recent movements in the Classical music world is Minimalism. You can find a thorough introduction to the concept here, but my understanding of the basic idea is this:

The Western musical tradition is nothing more than the evolution of meaningless ornamentation – the best way to express musical ideas is a few at a time, and you should take the time to appreciate them.

I haven’t really listened to much of this music, but The Photographer is a fine example. Its composer is Philip Glass, probably the most well-known composer in this style. If you’ve seen The Illusionist, Secret Window, The Hours, or The Truman Show, you’ve heard his music (though these are mostly in Post-Minimalist or other styles).

What I find really interesting is that Trance music works on the same principle, though it hasn’t been as thoroughly defined or debated. There have been many recent offshoots of Trance that are more song-oriented (which kind of parallels the evolution of Post-Minimalism from Minimalism), but the original Trance that came into its own during the early-mid 90’s relied on the extended repetition of a few musical lines, which slowly evolved over the course of the song. Ishkur’s guide has plenty of examples.

October 30, 2006

Strange Bedfellows

Filed under: Music — Derek Smootz @ 7:38 am

While we typically treat music as divisible into distinct genres, there are always musicians working to bridge stylistic gaps, combining disparate musical styles in search of a fresh sound. Following are a few of the more…amusing…recent genre-fusions. You can make your own decisions about their quality.

Celtic Punk

If you’re into punk, you probably already know about Flogging Molly and the Dropkick Murphys. If it was just one group, it could be viewed as a strange experiment, but there are two successful groups, which gives this credibility as an actual genre.

Dance Opera

A lot of New Age/Nu Ambient music incorporates classical elements – that’s established practice. Operatica, however, takes things a few steps further, mashing actual opera arias (and other classical vocal fare) into straight-ahead electronica. If you’ve seen The Fifth Element, you’ve already been exposed.

Lounged (yes, that’s a verb)

Richard Cheese and Lounge Against the Machine perform Lounge-style covers of songs that just weren’t intended to be covered that way, including Papa Roach’s Last Resort, Coldplay’s Yellow, Madonna’s Material Girl, the Beastie Boys’ Brass Monkey, Depeche Mode’s Personal Jesus, and that all-time classic, Ice-Ice Baby.

October 26, 2006

That’s MY name, YOU can’t have it!

Filed under: General — Derek Smootz @ 10:08 am

Intellectual Property law is the bane of musicians – we want to focus on our art, but if we don’t file the right papers or put the right symbols in our liner notes, we can find that someone else has stolen our work, or worse, claim that we’ve stolen theirs. But the music itself isn’t the only thing the law entangles – artist’s names can cause problems as well.

Fans of Conjure One may notice that the same voice sings Center of the Sun and Make a Wish from the first album (credited as Poe), and Endless Dream, One Word and Extraordinary Ways from the second (credited as Jane). Why the change in pseudonyms? The rumor is that her former label, Atlantic, is tenaciously holding onto the rights to the name “Poe.” Try as I might, I’ve been unable to find a clear, official source to document this, but I found plenty of hints and allusions on Poe’s website.

A more humorous example is found on the back of Aphex Twin’s “drukqs” album. The back cover includes the following disclaimer, verbatim:

Aphex is a registered trademark of Aphex Systems Limited and is used by permission.
(This must be in same font, text size etc as rest of artwork, and clearly legible.)

October 25, 2006

O Frabjous Day!

Filed under: General — Derek Smootz @ 12:38 pm

I should have heeded my own warning – I ended up frittering away half an hour at Ishtar’s site (see today’s earlier entry). When I pulled myself away, I was left with a burning desire for new music. I’ve never seriously listened to Aphex Twin, but I’ve heard a bit here and there and thought it was interesting. So, I read through his Wikipedia entry and headed off to spend lunch at the record store.

I love the Barnes & Noble near my work – they have tons of those listening stations where you can scan any album to hear samples and (usually) read a critic’s review. Being a frequent customer, I thought I was familiar with their stocking system. They have a Classical wall and small bins for New Age, Christian, World, and Rap, with pretty much everything else – including Aphex Twin – stuck into Pop/Rock. I looked through the “Ap”s, but couldn’t find Aphex Twin.

“Apoptygma Berzerk is here (yoink!), and they’re not nearly as big as Aphex Twin,” I thought. “Well, the Wikipedia entry had mentioned the pseduonym ‘AFX,’ so maybe ‘Af’ – no, not there either. Surely they didn’t think ‘Aphex Twin’ was a person’s name, and file it under ‘Twin, Aphex’ right? No, not there…”

So, nearly defeated, I headed over to the small, out-of-the-way “Dance” bin that typically holds compilations with swimsuit models on the cover and names like “Super Ultra Trance Party 2004, Volume XVII, Mixed by DJ 1337-f4ce.” But, to my surprise, this was no longer the “Electronic/Dance” bin – it was now the “Rap” bin! So, what now occupied the space where Rap had previously resided? I looked over that way, and the first thing to catch my eye was the new Engima album. And above it, the new Delerium album! And there, in the corner, was Aphex Twin. And there was Olive, and Armin Van Buuren, and Orbital…all in the new *Electronic* bin!!! The swimsuit girls are right there beside the real stuff, and the sign still says “Pop/Rock,” but this is my new home. Well, at least when I’m shopping for music at lunch.

It’s a wide, wide world

Filed under: Music — Derek Smootz @ 7:56 am

I don’t think people understand just how varied music is. Most people listen primarily to one or a few genres of music, and may have some appreciation of the depth of these, but I doubt it’s possible for a single person to really keep up with ALL modern music. While that is simply the way of things, I think people should be more aware of just how wide and deep the world of music is.

A number of years ago, my mother mentioned to a co-worker that she listened to Classical music. He responsed along these lines: “Oh, a friend of mine really likes Yanni!”. Oh, how I wish I had been there. In case you didn’t know, Yanni’s a New Age artist. He’s performed with an orchestra, but so have The Eagles. That doesn’t qualify Yanni, or The Eagles, for a place in the Classical rack at the record shop.

I think Classical is more widely misunderstood than any popular music genre – people who don’t listen to Classical seem to think that it IS a genre. There’s no more truth to that than the notion that “Pop/Rock” is a genre. Just as Justin Timberlake, Dido, and Pantera get lumped together for the sake of the music store’s efficiency, so do Handel, Orff, and Brahms. The music in the Classical section represents the “greatest hits” of roughly 500 years, and the length of songs, instruments used, and stylistic differences are just as great there as in the popular music of the past 60 years.

Particularly abrasive to me, personally, is the notion that all electronic music is “Techno.” Trance, Chillout, Synthpop, Drums’n'Bass, Industrial, it’s all “Techno” to some people. Well, not to me. Not to all the other fans of electronic music. And, especially, not to Ishkur, who maintains a website dedicated to educating the masses on the fine point of this discussion. Be warned, it’s easy to waste a LOT of time there.

I’m confident that if you take the time to look into the worlds of Jazz, Country, Hip-Hop, or any other type of music, you’ll find that there are many subgenres, that bands are constantly coming and going, and that new sounds are constantly evolving. You don’t have to like them, but please recognize that they’re there.

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress